Re: Directory Services Activities Report - 10/92

Russ Wright <wright@lbl.gov> Sat, 10 October 1992 16:58 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02097; 10 Oct 92 12:58 EDT
Received: from NRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02093; 10 Oct 92 12:58 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08269; 10 Oct 92 12:58 EDT
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.02366-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Sat, 10 Oct 1992 17:24:41 +0100
Received: from lbl.gov by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.24487-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Sat, 10 Oct 1992 17:24:34 +0100
Received: from Mac-mailer (macruss.lbl.gov) by lbl.gov (4.1/1.39) id AA14944; Sat, 10 Oct 92 09:25:02 PDT
Message-Id: <9210101625.AA14944@lbl.gov>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 92 09:21:27 -800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Russ Wright <wright@lbl.gov>
To: Steve Hardcastle-Kille <S.Kille@isode.com>
Subject: Re: Directory Services Activities Report - 10/92
Cc: tpt2@isi.edu, osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk

> Reporting on the NIST implementation, with statistics of just under two
> operations per day, and claiming this as a pilot, confirms all of the
> worst suspicions on those who ridicule X.500.   
> 
> If we are going to include stats, lets do it for the bits that are
> working well.    A lot of pieces are doing real operation (I gather
> that one DSA is doing about 10,000 operations per day).   

I agree.  Although It is nice to see the CUSTOS is getting some use, it 
does make it look like no one is using X.500.  Maybe something as simple 
as adding a summary of the DSA stats would be useful.  I would also like 
to see the total number of organizations in the pilot (hopefully a number 
that keeps getting bigger!).

On a related issue, some time ago we talked about adding a set of 
attributes for counting the DIT.  Maybe this is worth discussing again.

Russ