Re: Three revised Internet Drafts

Erik Skovgaard <eskovgaa@cue.bc.ca> Thu, 30 January 1992 20:32 UTC

Received: from relay.cdnnet.ca by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23434; 30 Jan 92 15:32 EST
Received: by relay.CDNnet.CA (4.1/1.14) id AA18662; Thu, 30 Jan 92 12:32:08 PST
Date: 30 Jan 92 12:13 -0800
From: Erik Skovgaard <eskovgaa@cue.bc.ca>
To: Steve Hardcastle-Kille <S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Cc: Christian Huitema <Christian.Huitema@sophia.inria.fr>, osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk, internet-drafts@NRI.Reston.VA.US, Dave Piscitello <dave@sabre.bellcore.com>
In-Reply-To: <1922.696793065@UK.AC.UCL.CS>
Message-Id: <910*eskovgaa@cue.bc.ca>
Subject: Re: Three revised Internet Drafts

Steve,

I don't agree with you that we should use different syntax.  What
is the user supposed to do if the O/R Name concists of a DN?

I do not really care if we use a comma or semicolon, but it should
be the same delimiter for X.400 and X.500.

                                       ....Erik.