Rep (2) : simple information lookup services

Ascan Woermann <Woermann@osi.e3x.fr> Mon, 19 July 1993 22:07 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03477; 19 Jul 93 18:07 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03473; 19 Jul 93 18:07 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18679; 19 Jul 93 18:07 EDT
X400-Received: by mta haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk in /PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD=gold 400/C=gb/; Relayed; Mon, 19 Jul 1993 22:38:47 +0100
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1993 22:38:47 +0100
X400-Originator: osi-ds-request@cs.ucl.ac.uk
X400-Recipients: non-disclosure:;
X400-MTS-Identifier: [/PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD=gold 400/C=gb/; haig.cs.uc.311:19.06.93.21.38.47]
Priority: Non-Urgent
DL-Expansion-History: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk ; Mon, 19 Jul 1993 22:38:47 +0100;
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Ascan Woermann <Woermann@osi.e3x.fr>
Message-ID: <7431179105170woer*/S=Woermann/OU=OSI/O=E3X/PRMD=E3X/ADMD=atlas/C=FR/@MHS>
To: Non Receipt Notification Requested <osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <9307191658.AA25215@berfert.csd.uwo.ca>
References: "93 2:32 pm":
Subject: Rep (2) : simple information lookup services

Danny,
I think your reply is worth sending out on the list, so here it is : 

> Ascan:
> 
> There is little doubt that users need simpler interfaces to Directory Services
> for everyday use and the success of X.500.
> So you are quite right in your desire to stimualte conversation on  the
> subject.   Here are my thoughts:
> 
> FIRST from the technology side:
> The general facility is that defined by the X.500 specification. I would 
> not spend too much time trying to create a new general interface. 
> A general interface protocol is often complex, containing operations (verbs)
> rarely used.  Nonetheless, they are there for completeness and as building 
> blocks for higher level abstractions.
> 
> Human and/or machine interfaces provided by advances such as LDAP will be
> used in certain situations by certain users.  However, other users will
> generate their own presentation and perhaps DUA - Application interfaces.
> Some developments will see wide spread use while others will be restricted
> to a certain domain, machine type, or presentation vehicle. 
> 
> SECOND from the marketing side:
> Without a friendly / consistant user interface a system rarely gets very far
> outside the development center.  IE. it does not sell well.
> This is where X.500 is lacking at the moment.  Efforts to create a simpler
> general interface should therefore be based on a market orientation.
> We need a general interface which will profile X.500 as a winner to the
> right customers.
> 
> I suggest that before any major efforts is made to create
> the next best Directory access package, that a market target be identified and
> their requirements investigated.
> 
> ...  Danny 
> --
> 
> =========================================================================
> =  Daniel L. Silver    University of Western Ontario, London, Canada    =
> =                      N6A 3K7 - Dept. of Comp. Sci. - Office: MC27b    =
> =  dsilver@csd.uwo.ca  H: (519)473-6168   O: (519)679-2111 (ext.6903)   =
> =========================================================================