IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Directory Services Activities Report - 10/92

Steve Hardcastle-Kille <S.Kille@isode.com> Sat, 10 October 1992 10:02 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00877; 10 Oct 92 6:02 EDT
Received: from NRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00873; 10 Oct 92 6:02 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03074; 10 Oct 92 6:02 EDT
Received: from glengoyne.isode.com by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.01527-3@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Sat, 10 Oct 1992 10:25:35 +0100
Received: from localhost by glengoyne.isode.com with SMTP (PP) id <02026-0@glengoyne.isode.com>; Sat, 10 Oct 1992 09:03:36 +0100
To: tpt2@isi.edu
cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Directory Services Activities Report - 10/92
Phone: +44-71-223-4062
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 09 Oct 92 14:57:04 -0700. <199210092157.AA03415@zephyr.isi.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 92 09:03:34 +0100
Message-ID: <2024.718704214@isode.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Steve Hardcastle-Kille <S.Kille@isode.com>

The DSAR report is getting a bit sparse!  (I guess I take a share of the
blame).

Reporting on the NIST implementation, with statistics of just under two
operations per day, and claiming this as a pilot, confirms all of the
worst suspicions on those who ridicule X.500.   

If we are going to include stats, lets do it for the bits that are
working well.    A lot of pieces are doing real operation (I gather
that one DSA is doing about 10,000 operations per day).   

Steve

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email