Re: Whois++ and X.500

Chris Weider <clw@bunyip.com> Wed, 27 September 1995 21:24 UTC

Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Chris Weider <clw@bunyip.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 1995 16:59:26 -0400
Message-Id: <199509272059.QAA02751@kosh.bunyip.com>
To: osi-ds@cl.ucl.ac.uk, pays@gctech.edelweb.fr
Subject: Re: Whois++ and X.500
Cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk

I know Paul-Andre is trying to devote his attention to things that are paying 
better :^) but I did want to pick up a few of his points. 
There is room for more than WHOIS++ with this index technology.
We're beginning to see that this can be used as the basis of a more general
query routing protocol. And I'm sure we'll be snagging some of the good 
bits of SOLO as we attempt to integrate technologies. :^)

And I think that we are slowly evolving an Internet directory service.
But it's going to be multi-protocol, at least for a while, and there are
still plenty of knotty issues to work out. So I heartily endorse
Paul-Andre's 4 points and we're getting there.
Chris

Whois++ and X.500 D.W.Chadwick
Re: Whois++ and X.500 Chris Weider
Re: Whois++ and X.500 Paul-Andre Pays
Re: Whois++ and X.500 Mark Wahl
Re: Whois++ and X.500 Chris Weider
Re: Whois++ and X.500 Chris Weider