IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: UFN take 2

Einar Stefferud <Stef@nma.com> Sat, 25 January 1992 22:31 UTC

Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06639; 25 Jan 92 17:31 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06635; 25 Jan 92 17:31 EST
Received: from ics.uci.edu by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.09615-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Sat, 25 Jan 1992 21:09:10 +0000
Received: from nma.com by q2.ics.uci.edu id ai24683; 25 Jan 92 12:10 PST
Received: from odin.nma.com by nma.com id aa02687; 25 Jan 92 11:35 PST
To: Alan Young <awy@concurrent.co.uk>, osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: UFN take 2
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 24 Jan 92 12:33:12 +0000. <2220.696256392@concurrent.co.uk>
Reply-to: Stef@nma.com
From: Einar Stefferud <Stef@nma.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 92 11:32:59 PST
Message-ID: <27745.696367979@nma.com>
Sender: stef@nma.com

Interesting -- 

> and there is also the increasing likelyhood of multi-attribute RDNs
> which must be unambiguously specified.

The likelyhood is 100%, if you remember the rules for residentialPerson.

The NADF use of the multi-attribute RDN is only taking advantage of this.

Best...\Stef

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email