IETF-OSI-DS proceedings

Glenn Mansfield <glenn@aic.co.jp> Wed, 25 November 1992 15:35 UTC

Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1992 22:37:10 -0000
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Glenn Mansfield <glenn@aic.co.jp>
Message-Id: <9211251337.AA25317@aic-wide.aic.co.jp>
To: steve@isode.com
Subject: IETF-OSI-DS proceedings
Cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk, spp@aic.co.jp

Steve,
     We are keenly looking forward to seeing the minutes of the IETF-OSI-DS
- want to get an alpha version of the documents incorporating the comments/
opinions and answering the doubts raised, before the end of this year. 
     Ofcourse, Mark has been very kind to give us some preliminary feedback  
but that has fed the appetite instead of satisfying it :-)
     
     Cheers


     glenn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
   >>From mak@merit.edu Thu Nov 19 14:25:13 1992
   >>Received: from cosmos.aic.co.jp by melody.aic.co.jp (4.1/6.4J.6-91/1/29)
   >>	id AA09193; Thu, 19 Nov 92 14:25:11 JST
   >>Received: from aic-wide.aic.co.jp (bass) by cosmos.aic.co.jp (4.0/6.4J.6-92/2)
   >>	id AA23811; Thu, 19 Nov 92 14:25:10 JST
   >>Received: from merit.edu by aic-wide.aic.co.jp (4.1/2.7W)
   >>	id AA23010; Thu, 19 Nov 92 14:25:06 JST
   >>Return-Path: <mak@merit.edu>
   >>Received: by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0)
   >>	id AA26318; Thu, 19 Nov 92 00:25:03 -0500
   >>Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 00:25:03 -0500
   >>From: "Mark Knopper" <mak@merit.edu>
   >>Message-Id: <9211190525.AA26318@merit.edu>
   >>To: glenn@aic.co.jp, thomas@aic.co.jp
   >>Subject: osi-ds presentations
   >>Status: RO
   >>
   >>Thomas and Glenn,
   >>  I think there were technical problems with the video/audio multicast
   >>at the OSI-DS sessions on Monday, so you were not able to see or hear us.
   >>However you will be pleased to hear that the presentation I gave went
   >>very well. Steve H-K was more excited than I have ever seen him and
   >>I have been giving versions of this presentation for at least the last
   >>4 IETFs.
   >>  Steve had some general questions about the image concept. He asked why
   >>we needed an image for all of IP, rather than a more specialized image
   >>for say the network number assignment problem (as I have been working
   >>on with GSI-NIC and RIPE-NCC). This is something that we should think
   >>more about.
   >>  The group agreed that the two documents should be re-issued as
   >>internet-drafts, intended to be forwarded as Experimental RFCs.
   >>One specific comment was that we clean up the syntax in the object
   >>definitions (it is somewhat loose).
   >>  The presentation I made was mainly written up on transparencies with
   >>colored markers. I will type it in and send it to you. I used your several
   >>pictures, which were very helpful. Thank you very much for all of your
   >>work.
   >>	Mark
   >>

IETF-OSI-DS proceedings Glenn Mansfield