IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question

pays@faugeres.inria.fr Wed, 02 June 1993 06:56 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00494; 2 Jun 93 2:56 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00490; 2 Jun 93 2:56 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01355; 2 Jun 93 2:56 EDT
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.01111-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 2 Jun 1993 07:14:22 +0100
Received: from faugeres.inria.fr by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.01080-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 2 Jun 1993 07:14:18 +0100
X400-Received: by /PRMD=inria/ADMD=atlas/C=fr/; Relayed; 02 Jun 93 08:13:42+0200
Date: 02 Jun 93 08:13:42+0200
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: pays@faugeres.inria.fr
To: Alan.Young@zh014.ubs.ubs.ch, jgill@nsf.gov
Subject: Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question
cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Message-ID: <739001622.18198.0-faugeres.inria.fr*@MHS>

Please could you move this debate to an appropriate list
not the one dealing with X.500.

Thanks

-- PAP

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email