Re: QUIPU vs X.500 (was: A tool for...)
Steve Kille <S.Kille@isode.com> Sat, 13 November 1993 18:31 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03410;
13 Nov 93 13:31 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03406;
13 Nov 93 13:31 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14598;
13 Nov 93 13:31 EST
Received: from glengoyne.isode.com by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP
id <g.03273-3@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Sat, 13 Nov 1993 18:04:17 +0000
To: pays@faugeres.inria.fr
cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk, wright@lbl.gov
Subject: Re: QUIPU vs X.500 (was: A tool for...)
Phone: +44-81-332-9091
In-reply-to: Your message of 13 Nov 1993 18:47:44 +0100.
<753212864.27322.0-faugeres.inria.fr*@MHS>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1993 17:59:07 +0000
Message-ID: <6509.753213547@glengoyne.isode.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Steve Kille <S.Kille@isode.com>
Non-leaf DSAs should follow RFC 1276 now and transition to a 93 approach ASAP Steve