Re: Directory Services Activities Report - 10/92

"K. Spanier" <spanier@mailserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de> Mon, 12 October 1992 09:45 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07628; 12 Oct 92 5:45 EDT
Received: from NRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07624; 12 Oct 92 5:45 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10548; 12 Oct 92 5:45 EDT
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.01229-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Mon, 12 Oct 1992 09:28:13 +0100
Received: from mailserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.10172-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Mon, 12 Oct 1992 09:28:02 +0100
Received: from melvin.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de by mailserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de (4.1/ZDV-Uni-Tuebingen-1.0) id AA28396; Mon, 12 Oct 92 09:27:38 +0100
Received: by melvin.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de (4.1/ZDV-Uni-Tuebingen-1.0) id AA06770; Mon, 12 Oct 92 09:27:38 +0100
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 92 09:27:38 +0100
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "K. Spanier" <spanier@mailserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de>
Message-Id: <9210120827.AA06770@melvin.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de>
To: s.kille@isode.com
Subject: Re: Directory Services Activities Report - 10/92
Cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk

> From osi-ds-request@cs.ucl.ac.uk Sat Oct 10 17:56:49 1992
> Return-Path: <osi-ds-request@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
> Received: from mailserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de by melvin.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de (4.1/ZDV-Uni-Tuebingen-1.0)
> 	id AA06142; Sat, 10 Oct 92 17:56:48 +0100
> Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by mailserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de (4.1/ZDV-Uni-Tuebingen-1.0)
> 	id AA15043; Sat, 10 Oct 92 17:56:41 +0100
> Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP 
>           id <g.02366-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>uk>; Sat, 10 Oct 1992 17:24:41 +0100
> Received: from lbl.gov by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP 
>           id <g.24487-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>uk>; Sat, 10 Oct 1992 17:24:34 +0100
> Received: from Mac-mailer (macruss.lbl.gov) by lbl.gov (4.1/1.39) id AA14944;
>           Sat, 10 Oct 92 09:25:02 PDT
> Message-Id: <9210101625.AA14944@lbl.gov>
> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 92 09:21:27 -800
> From: wright@lbl.gov (Russ Wright)
> To: Steve Hardcastle-Kille <S.Kille@isode.com>
> Subject: Re: Directory Services Activities Report - 10/92
> Cc: tpt2@isi.edu, osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
> Status: R
> 
> > Reporting on the NIST implementation, with statistics of just under two
> > operations per day, and claiming this as a pilot, confirms all of the
> > worst suspicions on those who ridicule X.500.   
> > 
> > If we are going to include stats, lets do it for the bits that are
> > working well.    A lot of pieces are doing real operation (I gather
> > that one DSA is doing about 10,000 operations per day).   
> 
> I agree.  Although It is nice to see the CUSTOS is getting some use, it 
> does make it look like no one is using X.500.  Maybe something as simple 
> as adding a summary of the DSA stats would be useful.  I would also like 
> to see the total number of organizations in the pilot (hopefully a number 
> that keeps getting bigger!).
> 
> On a related issue, some time ago we talked about adding a set of 
> attributes for counting the DIT.  Maybe this is worth discussing again.
> 
> Russ
> 

Would that mean that an organizational level DSA with about 500 operations
per day is not considered to be part of any X.500 Pilot ??? :-(

Kurt Spanier


X.500: Kurt Spanier, Zentrum fuer Datenverarbeitung,
       Uni-Tuebingen, DE