Re: Directory Services Activities Report - 10/92
"K. Spanier" <spanier@mailserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de> Mon, 12 October 1992 09:45 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07628;
12 Oct 92 5:45 EDT
Received: from NRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07624;
12 Oct 92 5:45 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10548;
12 Oct 92 5:45 EDT
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP
id <g.01229-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Mon, 12 Oct 1992 09:28:13 +0100
Received: from mailserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk
with Internet SMTP id <g.10172-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>;
Mon, 12 Oct 1992 09:28:02 +0100
Received: from melvin.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de
by mailserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de (4.1/ZDV-Uni-Tuebingen-1.0)
id AA28396; Mon, 12 Oct 92 09:27:38 +0100
Received: by melvin.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de (4.1/ZDV-Uni-Tuebingen-1.0) id
AA06770; Mon, 12 Oct 92 09:27:38 +0100
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 92 09:27:38 +0100
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "K. Spanier" <spanier@mailserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de>
Message-Id: <9210120827.AA06770@melvin.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de>
To: s.kille@isode.com
Subject: Re: Directory Services Activities Report - 10/92
Cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
> From osi-ds-request@cs.ucl.ac.uk Sat Oct 10 17:56:49 1992 > Return-Path: <osi-ds-request@cs.ucl.ac.uk> > Received: from mailserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de by melvin.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de (4.1/ZDV-Uni-Tuebingen-1.0) > id AA06142; Sat, 10 Oct 92 17:56:48 +0100 > Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by mailserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de (4.1/ZDV-Uni-Tuebingen-1.0) > id AA15043; Sat, 10 Oct 92 17:56:41 +0100 > Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP > id <g.02366-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>uk>; Sat, 10 Oct 1992 17:24:41 +0100 > Received: from lbl.gov by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP > id <g.24487-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>uk>; Sat, 10 Oct 1992 17:24:34 +0100 > Received: from Mac-mailer (macruss.lbl.gov) by lbl.gov (4.1/1.39) id AA14944; > Sat, 10 Oct 92 09:25:02 PDT > Message-Id: <9210101625.AA14944@lbl.gov> > Date: Sat, 10 Oct 92 09:21:27 -800 > From: wright@lbl.gov (Russ Wright) > To: Steve Hardcastle-Kille <S.Kille@isode.com> > Subject: Re: Directory Services Activities Report - 10/92 > Cc: tpt2@isi.edu, osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk > Status: R > > > Reporting on the NIST implementation, with statistics of just under two > > operations per day, and claiming this as a pilot, confirms all of the > > worst suspicions on those who ridicule X.500. > > > > If we are going to include stats, lets do it for the bits that are > > working well. A lot of pieces are doing real operation (I gather > > that one DSA is doing about 10,000 operations per day). > > I agree. Although It is nice to see the CUSTOS is getting some use, it > does make it look like no one is using X.500. Maybe something as simple > as adding a summary of the DSA stats would be useful. I would also like > to see the total number of organizations in the pilot (hopefully a number > that keeps getting bigger!). > > On a related issue, some time ago we talked about adding a set of > attributes for counting the DIT. Maybe this is worth discussing again. > > Russ > Would that mean that an organizational level DSA with about 500 operations per day is not considered to be part of any X.500 Pilot ??? :-( Kurt Spanier X.500: Kurt Spanier, Zentrum fuer Datenverarbeitung, Uni-Tuebingen, DE
- Directory Services Activities Report - 10/92 Tom Tignor
- Re: Directory Services Activities Report - 10/92 Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: Directory Services Activities Report - 10/92 Russ Wright
- Re: Directory Services Activities Report - 10/92 Tim Howes
- Reply to Directory Services Activities Report - 1… Kevin E. Jordan
- Re: Directory Services Activities Report - 10/92 K. Spanier
- Re: Directory Services Activities Report - 10/92 K. Spanier
- Re: Directory Services Activities Report - 10/92 Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: Directory Services Activities Report - 10/92 Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: Directory Services Activities Report - 10/92 John Tebbutt
- Re: Directory Services Activities Report - 10/92 Steven E. Newton