Re: DNS under o=Internet
valdis@vttcf.cc.vt.edu Tue, 04 February 1992 19:43 UTC
Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18038; 4 Feb 92 14:43 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18034; 4 Feb 92 14:43 EST
Received: from vttcf.CC.VT.EDU by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.05510-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Tue, 4 Feb 1992 18:53:06 +0000
Received: from LOCALHOST.vt.edu by vttcf.cc.vt.edu with SMTP (PP) id <127126-0@vttcf.cc.vt.edu>; Tue, 4 Feb 1992 13:53:23 +0000
To: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: DNS under o=Internet
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 04 Feb 92 17:16:02 GMT." <199202041616.AA24525@mitsou.inria.fr>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1992 13:53:20 -0500
From: valdis@vttcf.cc.vt.edu
Message-ID: <9202041443.aa18034@NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US>
> I support Wengyik on this. Registering the Internet Domain Name server under > "O=Internet" is much cleaner than messing with the root. It carves a neat > name space for Internet domains, and avoids conflicts with national > authorities. Add my vote to parking the DNS stuff under O=Internet - with the proviso that we get at least a gentleman's agreement with the people who control the root DNS servers as to the registration issues. As Wngyik says: "My solution is to avoid the problem altogether by viewing the DIT as a listing hierarchy :-)." The problem is that *somebody* has to take responsibility for *registration*, as otherwise we'll be listing anything and everything, and after a while, it will be so inconsistent and out of touch with reality that we'll be looking at proposals to move the tree to a new arc called "O=Horse-manure" ;) A second issue to consider is the set of second-level domains - a DNS tree in the X.500 directory that has O=Internet@domain=EDU will be quite useless if there are only 5 entries under it - do we wish to populate the tree with *all* domains, even if they are NOT participating in the current pilots? Valdis Kletnieks Computer Systems Engineer Virginia Tech
- DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: DNS under o=Internet William Manning
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Kenneth Carlberg
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Christian Huitema
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Tim Howes
- Re: DNS under o=Internet valdis
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Al Grimstad
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Mark Prior
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Sylvain Langlois
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Christian Huitema
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Christian Huitema
- Re: DNS under o=Internet William Manning
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Sylvain Langlois
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Sylvain Langlois
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Christian Huitema
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet A.Waugh
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Sylvain Langlois
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet A.Waugh
- Re: DNS under o=Internet George Michaelson
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet George Michaelson
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Steve Hardcastle-Kille