Re: LDAP
Steve Kille <S.Kille@isode.com> Wed, 09 June 1993 08:13 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00625; 9 Jun 93 4:13 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00621; 9 Jun 93 4:13 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02926; 9 Jun 93 4:13 EDT
Received: from glengoyne.isode.com by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.01277-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 9 Jun 1993 08:23:40 +0100
Received: from glengoyne.isode.com by glengoyne.isode.com with SMTP (PP) id <01007-0@glengoyne.isode.com>; Wed, 9 Jun 1993 08:26:40 +0100
To: "Brien L. Wheeler" <Brien.L.Wheeler@heckle.mitre.org>
cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: LDAP
Phone: +44-71-721-7582
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 08 Jun 1993 10:46:55 -0400. <9306081447.AA23538@mbunix.mitre.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1993 08:26:38 +0100
Message-ID: <1005.739610798@isode.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Steve Kille <S.Kille@isode.com>
I think that you are right. I think that this also leads to a different domain of application for the connectionless version. This would be suitable for DNS-type queries. Using a connection is more appropriate for a browsing DUA. This probably implies a rather different protocol. Steve
- LDAP Erik Huizer
- Re: LDAP pays
- Re: LDAP Tim Howes
- Re: LDAP Tim Howes
- Re: LDAP pays
- Re: LDAP Christian Huitema
- Re: LDAP Julian Onions
- Re: LDAP Julian Onions
- Re: LDAP pays
- Re: LDAP Mark Prior
- Re: LDAP Tim Howes
- Re: LDAP Christian Huitema
- Re: LDAP Tim Howes
- Re: LDAP Edwards Reed
- Re: LDAP Tim Howes
- Re: LDAP Tim Howes
- Re: LDAP Brien L. Wheeler
- Re: LDAP Steve Kille