IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: next draft of directory service recommendations draft

pays@faugeres.inria.fr Wed, 02 November 1994 08:21 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24806; 2 Nov 94 3:21 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24802; 2 Nov 94 3:21 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21838; 2 Nov 94 3:21 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.01005-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 2 Nov 1994 07:56:51 +0000
Received: from faugeres.inria.fr by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.12720-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 2 Nov 1994 07:56:41 +0000
X400-Received: by /PRMD=inria/ADMD=atlas/C=fr/; Relayed; 02 Nov 94 08:56:36+0100
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 1994 08:56:36 +0100
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: pays@faugeres.inria.fr
To: osi-ds@cl.ucl.ac.uk, osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: next draft of directory service recommendations draft
Message-ID: <783762996.24764.0-faugeres.inria.fr*@MHS>

a few fast comments

 1. I am still not convinced with RFC1274 conformance
	some definitions there are not really used
	new definitions apeared in between
 2. I would recommend to include in the references 
	a reference to the OIFP reports (available on the Paradise
	mail and ftp server)
 3. I think a more precise definition of master shadows is needed
	official shadow?? or any practical solution
 4. is it posible/worth giving the coordinates of 
	a ftp server for documents concerning the service
	the DSA managers mailing list  (distinct from osi-ds)

regards,

-- PAP

PS: I still have this osi-ds@cl.ucl.ac.uk   reply-to header....

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email