Chaining vs Referrals ??
LIVINGSTON-C <LIVINGSTON-C@smtpgw.nctsw.navy.mil> Fri, 23 February 1996 22:16 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12212;
23 Feb 96 17:16 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12208;
23 Feb 96 17:16 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07527;
23 Feb 96 17:16 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP
id <g.15810-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Fri, 23 Feb 1996 18:00:40 +0000
Received: from gatekeeper.nctsw.navy.mil by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk
with Internet SMTP id <g.00678-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>;
Fri, 23 Feb 1996 18:00:20 +0000
Received: by gatekeeper.nctsw.navy.mil; id MAA11164;
Fri, 23 Feb 1996 12:47:40 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: LIVINGSTON-C <LIVINGSTON-C@smtpgw.nctsw.navy.mil>
Received: from smtpgw.nctsw.navy.mil(138.145.16.4) by
gatekeeper.nctsw.navy.mil
via smap (g3.0.1) id sma011158; Fri, 23 Feb 96 12:47:35 -0500
Received: from ccMail by smtpgw.nctsw.navy.mil (IMA Internet Exchange 1.04b)
id 12dfdda0; Fri, 23 Feb 96 12:48:10 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 12:44:48 -0500
Message-ID: <12dfdda0@smtpgw.nctsw.navy.mil>
Subject: Chaining vs Referrals ??
To: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
If this is not the appropriate list for a wide response please forward
In a large distributive system of over 500 DSAs supporting strong
authentication for bind operations between User Agents (~1,000,000
users) and local DSAs, and between DSA to DSA; is there any technical
or performance issues that would favor DSA chaining over DSA referrals
or referral over chaining? As a practical matter the DUA should
perform an automatic rebind on referral so that the user does not have
to be involved with the process.
- Chaining vs Referrals ?? LIVINGSTON-C