IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Rep (2) : QUIPU vs X.500 (was: A tool for...)

Julian Onions <j.onions@nexor.co.uk> Tue, 16 November 1993 17:21 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08417; 16 Nov 93 12:21 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08413; 16 Nov 93 12:21 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13622; 16 Nov 93 12:21 EST
X400-Received: by mta haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk in /PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD=gold 400/C=gb/; Relayed; Tue, 16 Nov 1993 14:46:20 +0000
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1993 14:46:20 +0000
X400-Originator: osi-ds-request@cs.ucl.ac.uk
X400-Recipients: non-disclosure:;
X400-MTS-Identifier: [/PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD=gold 400/C=gb/; haig.cs.uc.138:16.10.93.14.46.20]
Priority: Non-Urgent
DL-Expansion-History: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk ; Tue, 16 Nov 1993 14:46:20 +0000;
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Julian Onions <j.onions@nexor.co.uk>
Message-ID: <4093.753461113@nexor.co.uk>
To: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Cc: pays@faugeres.inria.fr, Woermann@osi.e3x.fr, steve.kille@isode.com, Tim Howes <tim@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199311161434.JAA01040@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu>
Subject: Re: Rep (2) : QUIPU vs X.500 (was: A tool for...)
Discarded-X400-IPMS-Extensions: ccitt (0) data (9) pss (2342) (2342) (19200300) (200) (1)

Tim is right, could we have the issues layed out on the table.

What is it that QUIPU doesn't do that is the problem.
What would a full X.500(88) DSA do that is different.

My suspicion is that, as always, a little knowledge is dangerous.

Julian.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email