Whois++ and X.500
D.W.Chadwick@iti.salford.ac.uk Wed, 27 September 1995 16:16 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12104; 27 Sep 95 12:16 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12100; 27 Sep 95 12:16 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14267; 27 Sep 95 12:16 EDT
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.05018-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 27 Sep 1995 14:02:57 +0100
Via: uk.ac.salford.europa; Wed, 27 Sep 1995 14:02:37 +0100
Received: from mailgate-0.salford.ac.uk by europa.salford.ac.uk with SMTP (PP); Wed, 27 Sep 1995 14:05:09 +0100
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: D.W.Chadwick@iti.salford.ac.uk
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 1995 10:27:00 -0000
To: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Whois++ and X.500
X-Mailer: University of Salford cc:Mail/SMTP gateway 1.75
Encoding: 29 TEXT
Message-ID: <9509271216.aa14267@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Having just returned from a very interesting presentation about Whois++ at the recent Nameflow-Paradise meeting, it seems that the designers have one very good feature for searching for information, that X.500 does not have, and that is the ability to index on any attribute value or type, rather than simply on the distinguished RDN value, and to pass these indices up to the centroids (this was mentioned by Chris in his last message) What has not been mentioned are the problems with Whois++ such as: the lack of security features, the lack of registration for attribute types (e.g. name in English, nom in French and nam in Swedish all represent the same attribute type) - there are probably many more that I am not aware of yet because of my lack of in depth knowledge of the topic. So, how about turning the problem on its head. Instead of writing off X.500 because of its limitations, and looking to Whois++ as the panacea (which incidentally has taken a lot of ideas from X.500 in its design, these similarities with X.500 became very clear at the presentation), we take the good ideas from Whois++ and build them into X.500. Paul Barker started the ball rolling by suggesting Index DSAs, and Roland Hedberg is wanting to use Centoids to index into X.500 (am I correct Roland), then I think that this should perhaps lead to the best of both worlds - Whois++ type of indexing into an X.500 database of entries. This is the where my thoughts are leading to at the moment, so if anyone else already has done some work in this area, I would be pleased to know about it. David p.s. PAP, we were told that SOLO is nearly dead now, is this the case?
- Whois++ and X.500 D.W.Chadwick
- Re: Whois++ and X.500 Chris Weider
- Re: Whois++ and X.500 Paul-Andre Pays
- Re: Whois++ and X.500 Mark Wahl
- Re: Whois++ and X.500 Chris Weider
- Re: Whois++ and X.500 Chris Weider