Re: people CN

Ruenzler Walter <Walter.Ruenzler@zh014.ubs.ubs.ch> Thu, 26 November 1992 09:40 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00897; 26 Nov 92 4:40 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00893; 26 Nov 92 4:40 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03936; 26 Nov 92 4:40 EST
X400-Received: by mta haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk in /PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD=gold 400/C=gb/; Relayed; Thu, 26 Nov 1992 09:18:28 +0000
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 1992 09:18:28 +0000
X400-Originator: osi-ds-request@cs.ucl.ac.uk
X400-Recipients: non-disclosure:;
X400-MTS-Identifier: [/PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD=gold 400/C=gb/; haig.cs.uc.539:26.10.92.09.18.28]
Priority: Non-Urgent
DL-Expansion-History: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk ; Thu, 26 Nov 1992 09:18:28 +0000;
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Ruenzler Walter <Walter.Ruenzler@zh014.ubs.ubs.ch>
Message-ID: <"7351 Thu Nov 26 10:16:14 1992"@zh014.ubs.ubs.ch>
To: Thomas Lenggenhager <lenggenhager@gate.switch.ch>
Cc: Ruenzler Walter <Walter.Ruenzler@zh014.ubs.ubs.ch>, osi-ds <osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk>, wg-nap <wg-nap@rare.nl>, Walter.Ruenzler@zh014.ubs.ubs.ch
In-Reply-To: <8778*/S=lenggenhager/OU=gate/O=switch/PRMD=switch/ADMD=arcom/C=ch/@MHS>
Subject: Re: people CN

>Walter Ruenzler wrote:
>> We use NumId only in the case it is really needed (For the 2'nd, or
>> 3'rd person with the same name).
>> 
>> e.g.:
>> 
>> If we have 2 Bruno Keller than the 1'st is:
>> Keller Bruno
>> and the 2'nd is
>> Keller Bruno I
>
>Why don't you use numeric Ids?
>It would make it clearer that this is an artifical numbering and
>not a generational qualifier.

These are roman numbers like I, II, III.
>
>Wouldn't it be better to just skip the '1' and use for the second the '2'?
>
As i mentioned these numbers are from the telephon book so we have
to live with them.
And i think it makes not much difference because of the fluctuation
of the people. (e.g. we have a schmid werner II but no schmid werner
or schmid werner I)

Walter Ruenzler