Are subordinate or NSSR references mandatory?
Robert Adelberg <firstname.lastname@example.org> Fri, 10 November 1995 04:50 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02020;
9 Nov 95 23:50 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02013; 9 Nov 95 23:50 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01256; 9 Nov 95 23:50 EST
Received: from birch.ncr.disa.mil by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <email@example.com>; Thu, 9 Nov 1995 16:43:15 +0000
Received: from FHU.DISA.MIL (fhu.disa.mil [220.127.116.11]) by birch.ncr.disa.mil (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA15698; Thu, 9 Nov 1995 11:34:36 -0500
Received: from cc:Mail by FHU.DISA.MIL id AA815945809; Thu, 09 Nov 95 09:20:43 EST
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 95 09:20:43 EST
From: Robert Adelberg <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: Are subordinate or NSSR references mandatory?
Have a question regarding references. Fred and I at the JITC are preparing to revise the X.500 PICS (hopefully) for the last time and have come across some ambiguity in the base standard. Long story It all started with the conformance requirement for minimum knowledge, X.519, clause 9.2.2c. "A DSA shall conform to the minimal knowledge requirements defined in ITU-T Rec. X.518 | ISO/IEC 9594-4;". BTW, Minimum knowledge requirements are actually defined in X.501, clause 18.4 (unless there is a difference between minimal knowledge and minimum knowledge.) The question is our interpretation of the minimum knowledge specified in 18.4.1 - 18.4.4. 18.4.1 Superior Knowledge - If the DSA is not a first-level DSA, superior references are mandatory. 18.4.3 Supplier Knowledge - If the DSA consumes, supplier references are mandatory. 18.4.4 Consumer Knowledge - If the DSA supplies, consumer references are mandatory. Finally, 18.4.2 Subordinate knowledge - "A DSA that is the master DSA of a naming context shall maintain subordinate or non-specific subordinate references of category master knowledge to each master DSA holding (as master) an immediately subordinate naming context." Are we to assume that this translates into: If the DSA is not a centralized (solitary) DSA the subordinate OR non-specific subordinate reference are mandatory? Centralized DSA is define in the PICS to be: a DSA that is not capable of holding knowledge information about other DSAs. And another thing, there is no ASN.1 definition for subordinate knowledge as we assume it is some conglomeration of specific and non-specific knowledge. That is our interpretation, any comments on this would be appreciated. Rob Adelberg OSE Lab, JITC Ft. Huachuca, AZ USA