Rep (2) : Root level prodir combined results

Catherine Treca <Katy.Treca@dione.urec.fr> Fri, 06 May 1994 17:31 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03393; 6 May 94 13:31 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03389; 6 May 94 13:31 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09001; 6 May 94 13:31 EDT
X400-Received: by mta haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk in /PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD=gold 400/C=gb/; Relayed; Fri, 6 May 1994 16:47:53 +0100
Date: Fri, 06 May 1994 16:47:53 +0100
X400-Originator: osi-ds-request@cs.ucl.ac.uk
X400-Recipients: non-disclosure:;
X400-MTS-Identifier: [/PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD=gold 400/C=gb/; haig.cs.uc.914:06.04.94.15.47.53]
Priority: Non-Urgent
DL-Expansion-History: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk ; Fri, 6 May 1994 16:47:53 +0100;
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Catherine Treca <Katy.Treca@dione.urec.fr>
Message-ID: <76824285020146treca*/G=Katy/S=Treca/OU=dione/OU=urec/O=CNRS/PRMD=urec/ADMD=ATLAS/C=FR/@MHS>
Cc: Non Receipt Notification Requested <osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <12870*/S=lenggenhager/OU=gate/O=switch/PRMD=switch/ADMD=arcom/C=ch/@MHS>
References: "768210721.21440.0-faugeres.inria.fr":
Subject: Rep (2) : Root level prodir combined results

> >France is declaring one single national master (with several NSAP),
> >we would appreciate that the probing tool, do conform
> >with this and thus provide ONE single result.
> >
> >Additionaly I would like to understand how from one single
> >master (one PSAP) and on which criteria the tool decide
> >to separate (on the base of the NSAPs?) into 2 results.
> >What is being probed.h?
> >
> >  how do you know?decide that a different NSAP correspond to
> >  a common or several physical servers?
> >  why the number of probes differs for the 2 french results?
> >  Does not that mean that some of the probing site are not able
> >     to make use of multi NSAP PSAP?
> > ...
> >-- PAP
> 
> The prodir binary I am running here (written by NeXor without funding,
> without funding) does only probe on the first NSAP of the same community.
> 
> If INRIA would like to fund the improvement of the prodir that would
> be welcome. ;-)
> 
> In case NameFLOW takes really off, there might be some improvement to
> be seen some day.
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 

Thank you very much PAP, we fully agree with you....
We'd like to see the only one french dsa in the prob results, even if
our french dsa has more than one NSAP....this should be the real
disponibilty of opaxdsa...
We understand the Thomas'difficulties to change the program, but this
doesn't satisfy us at all.

And...from NameFLOW, we don't expect any thing by now... :-)

best regards

French girls JD KT



----- End Included Message -----