IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: DNS under o=Internet

yeongw@spartacus.psi.com Mon, 10 February 1992 13:20 UTC

Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa29176; 10 Feb 92 8:20 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa29170; 10 Feb 92 8:20 EST
Received: from spartacus.psi.com by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.10141-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Mon, 10 Feb 1992 12:03:24 +0000
Received: from localhost by spartacus.psi.com (5.61/1.3-PSI/PSINet) id AA00227; Mon, 10 Feb 92 07:03:05 -0500
Message-Id: <9202101203.AA00227@spartacus.psi.com>
To: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: DNS under o=Internet
Reply-To: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 06 Feb 92 23:57:32 -0800. <8739.697449452@nma.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1992 07:03:04 -0500
From: yeongw@spartacus.psi.com

> We can certainly just graft the entire DNS "registration" tree under
> o=internet if we can actually register o=internet.
> 
> ... the entire DNS is already a public directory with
> all entries visible to anyone in the internet, which is a publicly
> accessible system.  So, I would argue that the DNS entry owners have
> already given permission for public access to their directory entries,

Sounds good to me ...

If everybody else either agrees or doesn't care, this sounds like the
way to go.


Wengyik

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status