re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question
Tony Genovese <genovese@ophelia.nersc.gov> Thu, 27 May 1993 17:46 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10025; 27 May 93 13:46 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10021; 27 May 93 13:46 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19160; 27 May 93 13:46 EDT
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.03564-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Thu, 27 May 1993 17:49:33 +0100
Received: from osi-west.es.net by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.26471-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Thu, 27 May 1993 17:49:24 +0100
Received: from ophelia.nersc.gov by osi-west.es.net with SMTP (PP) id <13764-0@osi-west.es.net>; Thu, 27 May 1993 09:49:18 +0000
Received: by ophelia.nersc.gov (4.1/SMI-4.2-MHS-7.0) id AA19458; Thu, 27 May 93 09:49:17 PDT
Date: Thu, 27 May 1993 09:49:17 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Tony Genovese <genovese@ophelia.nersc.gov>
Message-Id: <9305271649.AA19458@ophelia.nersc.gov>
To: jgill@nsf.gov
Subject: re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question
Cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Hi Jock, > > The technology issue is important but not the only one. Is there no > integrating technology to render this issue moot? > If I understand your question the simple answer is yes. As I mentioned befor ESnet is an Internet mail shop. Most, if not all my users do not know they are using X.400 or for that mater many do not know they are useing SMTP ;-). Our users use, Quickmail, SMTP, Eudora, etc. Our main mail hubs handle the conversions (gatewaying) between the different mail systems. They think they are using Electronic Mail period. The Postmaster team of ESnet handles all the magic behind the scenes. The technology that accomplished this is being shaped by the efforts of IETF, RARE and others. Jock maybe you can attend one of these meetings and get a feel for the scope of what we are working on. > I am very much interested in the social and political implications of > architectural technology choices with respect to sustaining a robust > democracy. I believe Erik Huizer summed up the best course. We should at best do damage control to restrict the WAN mail systems to just two, SMTP and X.400. Tony...
- Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Tony Genovese
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Alf Hansen
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question James (J.K.) Ko
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Tony Genovese
- re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Huizer
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Goldstein--Ph +1-202-357-9717
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question James (J.K.) Ko
- re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Tony Genovese
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jon Crowcroft
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Colin Robbins
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Marco A. Hernandez
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Huizer
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Kille
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Alan.Young
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Julian Onions
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Goldstein--Ph +1-202-357-9717
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question pays
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Alf Hansen
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Sylvain Langlois
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Kille
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard