Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question
Jock Gill <jgill@nsf.gov> Mon, 31 May 1993 20:02 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa27187; 31 May 93 16:02 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa27183; 31 May 93 16:02 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa29022; 31 May 93 16:02 EDT
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.05961-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Mon, 31 May 1993 20:09:33 +0100
Received: from note.nsf.gov by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.04798-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Mon, 31 May 1993 20:09:26 +0100
Received: from hub.nsf.gov by Note.nsf.gov id aa26804; 31 May 93 15:08 EDT
Received: by hub.nsf.gov (5.57/Ultrix3.0-C) id AA25369; Mon, 31 May 93 15:07:04 -0400
Date: Mon, 31 May 1993 15:07:48 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Jock Gill <jgill@nsf.gov>
Subject: Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question
To: Alf Hansen <Alf.Hansen@delab.sintef.no>
Cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
In-Reply-To: <"4099*/G=Alf/S=Hansen/OU=delab/O=sintef/PRMD=uninett/ADMD= /C=no/"@MHS>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.05a.9305311546.a14868-a100000@note1.nsf.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Alf, In the PC world we look at where the developers are moving to try to figure out where the future may be. I do not understand why, if X.400 is so marvelous, there is so little software for it? Why no insanely great software for the X.400 world? Why are private corporations not risking their capital on this standard? Which standards have earned the respect of private capital? This is only an observation. I am not much interested in the underlying technology as long as it promotes a robust democracy and is able to provide fair and equitable access to all. Regards, JPG ______________________________________________________________________________ Jonathan P. Gill Office of Media Affairs The White House (202) 456-7150 ______________________________________________________________________________
- Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Tony Genovese
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Alf Hansen
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question James (J.K.) Ko
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Tony Genovese
- re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Huizer
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Goldstein--Ph +1-202-357-9717
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question James (J.K.) Ko
- re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Tony Genovese
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jon Crowcroft
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Colin Robbins
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Marco A. Hernandez
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Huizer
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Kille
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Alan.Young
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Julian Onions
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Goldstein--Ph +1-202-357-9717
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question pays
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Alf Hansen
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Sylvain Langlois
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Kille
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard