Re: CLDAP issues

Simon E Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu> Mon, 13 December 1993 06:06 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18830; 13 Dec 93 1:06 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18826; 13 Dec 93 1:06 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05839; 13 Dec 93 1:06 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.02650-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Sat, 11 Dec 1993 18:37:27 +0000
Received: from tipper.oit.unc.edu by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.29324-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Sat, 11 Dec 1993 18:37:19 +0000
Received: from localhost.oit.unc.edu by tipper.oit.unc.edu (SMI4.1/FvK 1.02) id AA00386; Sat, 11 Dec 93 13:37:00 EST
Message-Id: <9312111837.AA00386@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
To: Alan Young <Alan.Young@calibre.ch>
Cc: ldap@umich.edu, osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: CLDAP issues
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 11 Dec 93 11:05:09 +0100." <9214.755604309@calibre.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 93 13:37:00 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Simon E Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>

The reason for wanting to be able to authenticate individual messages is 
that I'm working towards an architecture where there is no separate DSA;
thus the binding is being made to the LDAP server not to the DSA. 

As for the multiple search responses in one UDP datagram; this solution will
work iff the protocol forbids search responses to be send in different 
datagrams.

Simon