Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question
"Eric D. Williams" <eric@isci.com> Thu, 27 May 1993 22:46 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15894;
27 May 93 18:46 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15890;
27 May 93 18:46 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa28484;
27 May 93 18:46 EDT
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP
id <g.04517-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Thu, 27 May 1993 22:54:30 +0100
Received: from uu5.psi.com by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP
id <g.08538-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Thu, 27 May 1993 22:54:20 +0100
Received: from port8.reston.pub-ip.psi.net
by uu5.psi.com (5.65b/4.0.071791-PSI/PSINet) via SMTP; id AA05867
for osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk; Thu, 27 May 93 17:55:44 -0400
Message-Id: <9305272155.AA05867@uu5.psi.com>
Received: from isc1.isci.com by isc1.isci.com id <1620-0@isc1.isci.com>;
Thu, 27 May 1993 17:52:01 +0000
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Eric D. Williams" <eric@isci.com>
Subject: Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question
To: OSI-DS <osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 27 May 93 17:51:58 EDT
Sensitivity: Personal
Conversion: Prohibited
Conversion-With-Loss: Prohibited
Encoding: 20 TEXT , 4 TEXT
>Date: Thu, 27 May 93 16:09:26 -0400 >From: "Peter G. Trei" <ptrei@bistromath.mitre.org> > >You write: > >> "Implementing, Transitioning, and Coexisting = Integrated Solutions - Now!!" > > ^^^^^^^ > I take it that subtracting "Now!!" from the equation means that >you feel that Integrated Solutions most definitely are NOT available >now. :-) > Peter > > That's a dash/hyphen not a minus sign :-()! I will make a change <g...g> Peace. Eric Eric D. Williams Integrated Systems and Communications, Inc. ISC 1899 L Street N.W. Suite 500 - Washington, DC 20036-3884 - Voice +1(202)331-3990 ewilliams@isci.com or guru@isci.com - Fax +1(202)331-4049 or +1(202)872-0896 "Implementing, Transitioning, and Coexisting means Integrated Solutions, Now!!"
- Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Tony Genovese
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Alf Hansen
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question James (J.K.) Ko
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Tony Genovese
- re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Huizer
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Goldstein--Ph +1-202-357-9717
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question James (J.K.) Ko
- re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Tony Genovese
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jon Crowcroft
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Colin Robbins
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Marco A. Hernandez
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Huizer
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Kille
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Alan.Young
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Julian Onions
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Goldstein--Ph +1-202-357-9717
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question pays
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Alf Hansen
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Sylvain Langlois
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Kille
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard