Re: RFC 1484 and 1485 updates
Steve Kille <S.Kille@isode.com> Fri, 11 November 1994 11:03 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01020; 11 Nov 94 6:03 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01016; 11 Nov 94 6:03 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02708; 11 Nov 94 6:02 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.00880-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Fri, 11 Nov 1994 09:59:35 +0000
Received: from glengoyne.isode.com by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.04955-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Fri, 11 Nov 1994 09:59:29 +0000
To: Thomas Lenggenhager <lenggenhager@gate.switch.ch>
cc: osi-ds <osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: RFC 1484 and 1485 updates
Phone: +44-81-332-9091
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 11 Nov 1994 10:55:14 +0100. <14142*/S=lenggenhager/OU=gate/O=switch/PRMD=switch/ADMD=arcom/C=ch/@MHS>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <25871.784548074.1@glengoyne.isode.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 1994 10:01:18 +0000
Message-ID: <25872.784548078@glengoyne.isode.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Steve Kille <S.Kille@isode.com>
My immediate reaction is that these codes do not seem to improve the readability of the syntax. I can't see that the politics justifies the change. Steve
- RFC 1484 and 1485 updates Steve Kille
- Re: RFC 1484 and 1485 updates Steve Kille
- Re: RFC 1484 and 1485 updates Thomas Lenggenhager