Re: IP namespace (Was: Re: root knowledge)
Steve Hardcastle-Kille <S.Kille@isode.com> Wed, 10 June 1992 18:55 UTC
Received: from nri.nri.reston.va.us by ietf.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04423; 10 Jun 92 14:55 EDT
Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24501; 10 Jun 92 14:54 EDT
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24494; 10 Jun 92 14:54 EDT
Received: from glenlivet.cs.ucl.ac.uk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.08336-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 10 Jun 1992 19:30:16 +0100
From: Steve Hardcastle-Kille <S.Kille@isode.com>
To: Christian Huitema <Christian.Huitema@sophia.inria.fr>
cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: IP namespace (Was: Re: root knowledge)
Phone: +44-71-223-4062
In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 14 May 92 08:04:14 -0100. <199205140806.AA19369@mitsou.inria.fr>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1992 19:29:41 +0100
Message-ID: <2623.708200981@UK.AC.UCL.CS>
Sender: S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.uk
I think that these are sound points. I really feel that it is time to get some of this into a document - perhaps an extract of the SPP document. This should contain a list of issues: - why you want to store the IP address space in the DS - axioms of the form you give Then it should derive a proposal or set of proposals. I think that this is needed, and would love to discuss it in Boston. Steve
- IP namespace (Was: Re: root knowledge) Thomas Johannsen
- Re: IP namespace (Was: Re: root knowledge) yeongw
- Re: IP namespace (Was: Re: root knowledge) William C. Green
- Re: IP namespace (Was: Re: root knowledge) Christian Huitema
- Re: IP namespace (Was: Re: root knowledge) Thomas Johannsen
- Re: IP namespace (Was: Re: root knowledge) Steve Hardcastle-Kille