Re: standard ShadowingAgreement

D.W.Chadwick@iti.salford.ac.uk Wed, 04 October 1995 19:23 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17700; 4 Oct 95 15:23 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17696; 4 Oct 95 15:23 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19013; 4 Oct 95 15:23 EDT
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.06224-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 17:01:07 +0100
Via: uk.ac.salford.europa; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 17:00:58 +0100
Received: from mailgate-1.salford.ac.uk by europa.salford.ac.uk with SMTP (PP); Wed, 4 Oct 1995 17:00:52 +0100
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: D.W.Chadwick@iti.salford.ac.uk
Date: 4 Oct 95 16:19
To: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: standard ShadowingAgreement
X-Mailer: University of Salford cc:Mail/SMTP gateway 1.75
Encoding: 58 TEXT
Message-ID: <9510041523.aa19013@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>

From: Michael Gsandtner <gsa@adv.magwien.gv.at>
Message-Id: <199510041231.AA27574@mandibula.adv.magwien.gv.at>
Subject: standard ShadowingAgreement
To: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk (OSIDS )
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 13:31:18 +0100 (MET)
X-Organization: Gemeinde Wien MD-ADV/Ma Referat EPS
X-Address: Rathausstr. 1, A-1082 Wien, Austria, Europe
X-Phone: +43 1 4000 91179
X-Fax: +43 1 4000 7141
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 482
X-Charset: LATIN1
X-Char-Esc: 29
X-Mta: DoubleSendmail (DECnet,X500) [pfp@adv.magwien.gv.at] 1.0
X-Doublesendmail-To: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
X-Doublesendmail-From: -fgsa@adv.magwien.gv.at


How is a Shadow Agreement between two DSAs established ?
----------
The answer is twofold, either:
by proprietary off line means (eg operator intervention, probably the case with
the digital DSA)
or by use of the DOP. Most manufacturers are slow in implementing this
protocol, although I know that Digital have started.

P.S. Read my book about this, it is explained in there.

David



We are running DSAs from DIGITAL. But they are only able to shadow information
between DIGITAL DSAs, because they use a non standard ShadowingAgreement
ObjectClass to store the Agreement information in the directory (however, to
transfer data DISP is used).

Exists there a standard ShadowAgreement ?
---------
Not as yet. The ASN.1 exists for it, but it has not been defined as an
attribute type. This would be a simple task to do, but the standard's committee
could not decide on where to store it in the DIT.

David




Or can Shadowing only take place between DSAs of the same vendor ?
   (which I hope has to be answered with no)
----------
Certainly not, but each vendor will determine how to configure the agreement
into his/her DSA.
David


--Michi