Re: Proposed LIDS Working Group

"Erik Huizer (SURFnet BV)" <Erik.Huizer@surfnet.nl> Wed, 09 March 1994 15:40 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05854; 9 Mar 94 10:40 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05850; 9 Mar 94 10:40 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08445; 9 Mar 94 10:40 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.02454-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 9 Mar 1994 14:13:44 +0000
Received: from sapling.surfnet.nl by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.19780-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 9 Mar 1994 14:13:18 +0000
X400-Received: by mta sapling.surfnet.nl in /PRMD=surf/ADMD=400net/C=nl/; Relayed; Wed, 9 Mar 1994 15:13:55 +0100
X400-Received: by /PRMD=surf/ADMD=400net/C=nl/; Relayed; Wed, 9 Mar 1994 15:12:24 +0100
X400-Received: by /PRMD=surf/ADMD=400net/C=nl/; Relayed; Wed, 9 Mar 1994 15:12:23 +0100
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 1994 15:12:23 +0100
X400-Originator: Erik.Huizer@SURFnet.nl
X400-Recipients: non-disclosure:;
X400-MTS-Identifier: [/PRMD=surf/ADMD=400net/C=nl/; survis.sur.879:09.02.94.14.12.24]
X400-Content-Type: P2-1984 (2)
Content-Identifier: Re: Proposed ...
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Erik Huizer (SURFnet BV)" <Erik.Huizer@surfnet.nl>
Message-ID: <"survis.sur.883:09.02.94.14.12.29"@surfnet.nl>
To: pays@faugeres.inria.fr
Cc: ietf-wnils@ucdavis.edu, osi-ds@cl.ucl.ac.uk, osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk, solo@pamir.inria.fr, wps@surfnet.nl
In-Reply-To: "763222176.15605.0-faugeres.inria.fr":
Subject: Re: Proposed LIDS Working Group
Organisation: SURFnet bv
Address: Cluetinckborch, P.O. Box 19035, 3501 DA Utrecht, NL
Phone: +31 30 310290
Telefax: +31 30 340903


> In order to help Tim adapt the LIDS charter would not it be possible
> to have a (few lines would be enough by now) a first idea of
> the charter of the other planned groups as well as a provisional name.
> This will enable to refer to the appropriate liaison in the LIDS charter
> and help all of us understand better the whole picture.

It already points to the WPS bof. The charter of that BOF should be
sufficient indication I think?

Erik