Re: Three revised Internet Drafts
Christian Huitema <Christian.Huitema@sophia.inria.fr> Thu, 30 January 1992 16:55 UTC
Received: from mitsou.inria.fr by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15686;
30 Jan 92 11:55 EST
Received: from localhost by mitsou.inria.fr with SMTP
(5.65c/IDA-1.2.8) id AA19713; Thu, 30 Jan 1992 17:56:15 +0100
Message-Id: <199201301656.AA19713@mitsou.inria.fr>
To: Steve Hardcastle-Kille <S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk, internet-drafts@NRI.Reston.VA.US,
Dave Piscitello <dave@sabre.bellcore.com>
Subject: Re: Three revised Internet Drafts
In-Reply-To: Your message of "30 Jan 92 11:34:07 GMT."
<1001.696771247@UK.AC.UCL.CS>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 92 17:56:15 +0000
From: Christian Huitema <Christian.Huitema@sophia.inria.fr>
X-Mts: smtp
>2) Distinguished Name Notation. "," should be the mandatory >separator. <> should be the prefered delimter for use in cases where >a delimiter is desired. Schema defaulting should be dropped. Where >a distinguished name notation is needed, the types should be explicit >and unambiguous. The defaulting rules are too complex. A set of >short keywords were agreed. Thus the DN Notation now has names of the >form <CN=Paul-Andre Pays, O=Inria, C=FR>. Mandating the attributes for Distinguished names is probably a good idea. However, if you compare your result: <CN=Paul-Andre Pays, O=Inria, C=FR> with the RARE standard for ORName notation: <S=Pays; O=INRIA; PRMD=INRIA; ADMD=ATLAS; C=FR;> then one really wonders why you stick to the comma and dont adopt the semi-colon! The potential for confusion is enormous here, specially if one uses the notation for 88 ORNames... Christian Huitema
- Three revised Internet Drafts Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: Three revised Internet Drafts Christian Huitema
- Re: Three revised Internet Drafts Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: Three revised Internet Drafts Sylvain Langlois
- Re: Three revised Internet Drafts Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Three revised Internet Drafts Hans Eriksson
- Re: Three revised Internet Drafts Christian Huitema
- Re: Three revised Internet Drafts Thomas Lenggenhager
- Re: Three revised Internet Drafts Paul-Andre Pays
- Re: Three revised Internet Drafts Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: Three revised Internet Drafts Paul-Andre Pays
- Re: Three revised Internet Drafts Christian Huitema
- Re: Three revised Internet Drafts Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: Three revised Internet Drafts valdis
- Re: Three revised Internet Drafts Paul-Andre Pays
- Re: Three revised Internet Drafts Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: Three revised Internet Drafts Paul-Andre Pays
- Re: Three revised Internet Drafts Steve Hardcastle-Kille