Re: Three revised Internet Drafts

Christian Huitema <Christian.Huitema@sophia.inria.fr> Thu, 30 January 1992 16:55 UTC

Received: from mitsou.inria.fr by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15686; 30 Jan 92 11:55 EST
Received: from localhost by mitsou.inria.fr with SMTP (5.65c/IDA-1.2.8) id AA19713; Thu, 30 Jan 1992 17:56:15 +0100
Message-Id: <199201301656.AA19713@mitsou.inria.fr>
To: Steve Hardcastle-Kille <S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk, internet-drafts@NRI.Reston.VA.US, Dave Piscitello <dave@sabre.bellcore.com>
Subject: Re: Three revised Internet Drafts
In-Reply-To: Your message of "30 Jan 92 11:34:07 GMT." <1001.696771247@UK.AC.UCL.CS>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 92 17:56:15 +0000
From: Christian Huitema <Christian.Huitema@sophia.inria.fr>
X-Mts: smtp

>2) Distinguished Name Notation.   "," should be the mandatory
>separator.   <> should be the prefered delimter for use in cases where
>a delimiter is desired.   Schema defaulting should be dropped.  Where
>a distinguished name notation is needed, the types should be explicit
>and unambiguous.   The defaulting rules are too complex.   A set of
>short keywords were agreed.  Thus the DN Notation now has names of the
>form <CN=Paul-Andre Pays, O=Inria, C=FR>.  

Mandating the attributes for Distinguished names is probably a good idea.
However, if you compare your result:
	<CN=Paul-Andre Pays, O=Inria, C=FR>
with the RARE standard for ORName notation:
	<S=Pays; O=INRIA; PRMD=INRIA; ADMD=ATLAS; C=FR;>
then one really wonders why you stick to the comma and dont adopt the
semi-colon! The potential for confusion is enormous here, specially if one
uses the notation for 88 ORNames...

Christian Huitema