The Yet another X.400 ... Debate

Tony Genovese <genovese@ophelia.nersc.gov> Wed, 02 June 1993 18:15 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11685; 2 Jun 93 14:15 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11676; 2 Jun 93 14:15 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id ag05735; 2 Jun 93 14:15 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07682; 2 Jun 93 12:27 EDT
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.03780-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 2 Jun 1993 17:20:29 +0100
Received: from osi-west.es.net by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.11501-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 2 Jun 1993 17:20:21 +0100
Received: from ophelia.nersc.gov by osi-west.es.net with SMTP (PP) id <22044-0@osi-west.es.net>; Wed, 2 Jun 1993 09:19:24 +0000
Received: by ophelia.nersc.gov (4.1/SMI-4.2-MHS-7.0) id AA24026; Wed, 2 Jun 93 09:19:22 PDT
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 93 09:19:22 PDT
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Tony Genovese <genovese@ophelia.nersc.gov>
Message-Id: <9306021619.AA24026@ophelia.nersc.gov>
To: Alan.Young@zh014.ubs.ubs.ch, jgill@nsf.gov, pays@faugeres.inria.fr
Subject: The Yet another X.400 ... Debate
Cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk

	Hi we are begining to exhaust the patience to the X.500 
mailing list.  

	PLEASE move the discussion to:

		ietf-osi-x400ops@cs.wisc.edu

This list contains everone who has been responding and 
represents this line of reasoning.

I would like to continue the debate, I disagree with Jock's 
position and I do not beleave he has address Alan Young's 
argument on scaling of mail systems. 

See you on the ietf-osi-x400ops@cs.wisc.edu list!

Tony...