Re: DUA implementors guidelines

Steve Kille <S.Kille@isode.com> Mon, 17 May 1993 14:25 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26367; 17 May 93 10:25 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26363; 17 May 93 10:25 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02880; 17 May 93 10:25 EDT
Received: from glengoyne.isode.com by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.01566-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Mon, 17 May 1993 09:59:54 +0100
Received: from glengoyne.isode.com by glengoyne.isode.com with SMTP (PP) id <01590-0@glengoyne.isode.com>; Mon, 17 May 1993 10:02:00 +0100
To: pays@faugeres.inria.fr
cc: wg-nap@rare.nl, osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: DUA implementors guidelines
Phone: +44-71-721-7582
In-reply-to: Your message of 16 May 1993 14:13:34 +0200. <737554414.16188.0-faugeres.inria.fr*@MHS>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 17 May 1993 10:01:56 +0100
Message-ID: <1585.737629316@isode.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Steve Kille <S.Kille@isode.com>

This initiative is a good one, which I'll gladly support.  It makes sense to
have the item on the agenda.   From experience, this sort of item is not
very useful unless there is a concrete plan to produce a document (i.e.,
someone to do real work....)

Steve