Re: Comments from Steve Kent on String repr. of DN
Steve Hardcastle-Kille <S.Kille@isode.com> Mon, 25 January 1993 18:13 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14884; 25 Jan 93 13:13 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14880; 25 Jan 93 13:13 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19986; 25 Jan 93 13:15 EST
Received: from glengoyne.isode.com by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.05469-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Mon, 25 Jan 1993 18:09:22 +0000
Received: from localhost.isode.com by glengoyne.isode.com with SMTP (PP) id <09920-0@glengoyne.isode.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:53:47 +0000
To: Erik Huizer <Erik.Huizer@surfnet.nl>
cc: RARE & IETF OSI-DS wg <osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Comments from Steve Kent on String repr. of DN
Phone: +44-71-223-4062
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 11 Nov 1992 16:34:41 +0000. <"survis.sur.913:11.10.92.16.33.21"@surfnet.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:53:42 +0000
Message-ID: <9918.727984422@isode.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Steve Hardcastle-Kille <S.Kille@isode.com>
Finally got to this! I have accepted Steve's first two comments, as they seem to be useful clarifications. > - The alternative approach cited here is not recommended, and > conflicts with the recommended approach, so why is it included? > I don't see any justification for this in the document. If one > includes such a contrasting apporoach, and does not recommend it, > then I think it deserves some rationale. I have removed this section, to bring this document in line with the naming guidelines, and the "don't wimp out" philosophy agreed by the WG. I will send round this revised I-D, and also an updated UFN I-D, with some editorial changes and clarifications I received. Steve
- Comments from Steve Kent on String repr. of DN Erik Huizer
- Re: Comments from Steve Kent on String repr. of DN Steve Hardcastle-Kille