Re: extending existing object classes vs deriving new classes
Paul Barker <P.Barker@cs.ucl.ac.uk> Wed, 22 February 1995 14:39 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01350; 22 Feb 95 9:39 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01346; 22 Feb 95 9:39 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05994; 22 Feb 95 9:39 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.02721-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 22 Feb 1995 13:47:34 +0000
Received: from macallan.cs.ucl.ac.uk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.04640-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 22 Feb 1995 13:45:29 +0000
To: "Luis P. Caamano" <lpc@sware.com>
cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk, edmund@sware.com
Subject: Re: extending existing object classes vs deriving new classes
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 21 Feb 95 13:26:34 EST." <9502211826.AA00761@alehouse.sware.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 13:45:23 +0000
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Paul Barker <P.Barker@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <9502220939.aa05994@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
> Does anybody know about any other sources that talk about the > new extensions to X.500 (1993) for schema support other than > the X.500 document itself or Sara Radicati's X.500 book? > There is also the book by Dave Chadwick, which is much more comprehenisve than either the Steedman or Radicati books. I would also recommend the (compendious) report by Andrew Waugh, which is useful because it is by an outsider to the X.500 standards process, and thus more of a critique. I have lost the FTP address for the report but Andrew's address is <A.Waugh@au.csiro.dit.mel>. Paul
- extending existing object classes vs deriving new… Luis P. Caamano
- RE: extending existing object classes vs deriving… Debasish Biswas
- Re: extending existing object classes vs deriving… Paul Barker
- RE: extending existing object classes vs deriving… PGUPTA
- Re: extending existing object classes vs deriving… Andrew Waugh