Re: UFN take 2

Keld J|rn Simonsen <keld@dkuug.dk> Fri, 24 January 1992 18:59 UTC

Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13741; 24 Jan 92 13:59 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13737; 24 Jan 92 13:59 EST
Received: from dkuug.dk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.15322-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Fri, 24 Jan 1992 17:53:35 +0000
Received: by dkuug.dk (5.64+/8+bit/IDA-1.2.8) id AA06507; Fri, 24 Jan 92 18:53:23 +0100
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 92 18:53:23 +0100
From: Keld J|rn Simonsen <keld@dkuug.dk>
Message-Id: <9201241753.AA06507@dkuug.dk>
To: Paul-Andre.Pays@inria.fr, S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: UFN take 2
Cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29

> >   - the delimiters should be square brackets.   Thus:
> >      [Paul-Andre-Pays, Inria, FR] or if you prefer
> >      [CN=Paul-Andre Pays, O=Inria, C=FR]
> >      I think that <> is already overloaded.  Square brackets could easily 
> >      be integrated with RFC 822 and X.400 UIPs modelled on 822, 
> >      which is also attractive.
> 
> Approved to, I was just giving an example and I have no special
> feeling for ">".  Let's go for square brackets

Well, for software which are intended for international use,
I would certainly advice not to use the [] (square brackets) as these
are problem characters in many places of the world. 

Keld