Re: DNS under o=Internet
Sylvain Langlois <sylvain@cli53an.edf.fr> Wed, 05 February 1992 13:10 UTC
Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08427; 5 Feb 92 8:10 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08421; 5 Feb 92 8:10 EST
Via: bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk; Wed, 5 Feb 1992 11:39:05 +0000
Received: from mcsun.eu.net by eros.uknet.ac.uk via EUnet with SMTP (PP) id <19151-0@eros.uknet.ac.uk>; Wed, 5 Feb 1992 10:29:46 +0000
Received: from corton.inria.fr by mcsun.EU.net with SMTP; id AA13013 (5.65a/CWI-2.138); Wed, 5 Feb 1992 11:28:34 +0100
Received: from edfder1.UUCP by corton.inria.fr (5.65c8d/91.12.15) via Fnet-EUnet id AA26788; Wed, 5 Feb 1992 10:49:32 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: from cli53an.der.edf.fr by edfder1.edf.fr, Wed, 5 Feb 92 10:46:42 +0100
PP-warning: Illegal Received field on preceding line
Received: from loghost by cli53an.der.edf.fr (4.1/SMI-4.0) id AA05196; Wed, 5 Feb 92 10:48:45 GMT
To: Steve Hardcastle-Kille <S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Cc: yeongw@spartacus.psi.com, osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: DNS under o=Internet
In-Reply-To: Steve Hardcastle-Kille's message of 04 Feb 92 18:44:53 +0000. <2009.697229093@UK.AC.UCL.CS>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 1992 10:48:44 +0000
Message-Id: <5195.697286924@cli53an>
From: Sylvain Langlois <sylvain@cli53an.edf.fr>
> You've convinced me. Lets move the DNS under O=Internet > Are there any objections to this? Is anyone still actively > supporting the status quo, or is the world apathetic? I'm not sure that this is a good question, but... How do regional networks or these kind of networks fit in this view. What will happend with Nordunet, EUnet? I could understand that they will become OU's under o=Internet... But what about RIPE which is not a network in itself but a coordination point of networks. This is not clear to me at all. This does not impact the DNS but this may impact the "definition" of o=Internet. I'm all confused and would appreciate explanations. Sylvain ---------------- Sylvain Langlois "Dogmatic attachement to the supposed merits (sylvain@cli53an.edf.fr) of a particular structure hinders the searc h of an appropriate structure" (Robert Fripp)
- DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: DNS under o=Internet William Manning
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Kenneth Carlberg
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Christian Huitema
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Tim Howes
- Re: DNS under o=Internet valdis
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Al Grimstad
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Mark Prior
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Sylvain Langlois
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Christian Huitema
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Christian Huitema
- Re: DNS under o=Internet William Manning
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Sylvain Langlois
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Sylvain Langlois
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Christian Huitema
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet A.Waugh
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Sylvain Langlois
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet A.Waugh
- Re: DNS under o=Internet George Michaelson
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet George Michaelson
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Steve Hardcastle-Kille