IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: DNS under o=Internet

Christian Huitema <Christian.Huitema@sophia.inria.fr> Wed, 05 February 1992 13:18 UTC

Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08795; 5 Feb 92 8:18 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08786; 5 Feb 92 8:18 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.28740-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 5 Feb 1992 12:28:20 +0000
Received: from mitsou.inria.fr by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.01617-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 5 Feb 1992 12:29:04 +0000
Received: from localhost by mitsou.inria.fr with SMTP (5.65c/IDA-1.2.8) id AA25543; Wed, 5 Feb 1992 13:28:05 +0100
Message-Id: <199202051228.AA25543@mitsou.inria.fr>
To: valdis@vttcf.cc.vt.edu
Cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: DNS under o=Internet
In-Reply-To: Your message of "04 Feb 92 13:53:20 EST." <"5582 Tue Feb 4 18:55:36 1992"@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 1992 13:28:04 +0000
From: Christian Huitema <Christian.Huitema@sophia.inria.fr>
X-Mts: smtp

>A second issue to consider is the set of second-level domains -
>a DNS tree in the X.500 directory that has O=Internet@domain=EDU
>will be quite useless if there are only 5 entries under it - do
>we wish to populate the tree with *all* domains, even if they are
>NOT participating in the current pilots?

Looks like a nice justification for a gateway between X.500 and e.g. DNS
plus "finger"... Anybody interested?

Christian Huitema

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status