Re: CLDAP (Connectionless LDAP)

Tim Howes <tim@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu> Mon, 13 December 1993 16:31 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24500; 13 Dec 93 11:31 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24496; 13 Dec 93 11:31 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16490; 13 Dec 93 11:31 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.03992-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Mon, 13 Dec 1993 15:13:01 +0000
Received: from terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.01740-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Mon, 13 Dec 1993 15:12:48 +0000
Received: from vertigo.rs.itd.umich.edu by terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu (8.6.4/2.2) with SMTP id KAA08806; Mon, 13 Dec 1993 10:12:08 -0500
Message-Id: <199312131512.KAA08806@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu>
To: Steve Kille <S.Kille@isode.com>
cc: Erik Huizer <huizer@surfnet.nl>, Alan Young <awy@calibre.ch>, osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: CLDAP (Connectionless LDAP)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 13 Dec 93 08:34:19 GMT." <24829.755771659@glengoyne.isode.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 93 10:12:07 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Tim Howes <tim@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu>

> From:    Steve Kille <S.Kille@isode.com>
> To:      Erik Huizer <huizer@SURFnet.nl>

> The CLDAP has reached the end of its online WG review, without significant
> change or comment.   Could this document now be submitted to the IESG
> as a proposed standard.

Um....maybe you are behind on your email, but there has been significant
discussion about this draft on the list.  I'd like to make sure it's
resolved before we push ahead.

The discussion mostly has been about how to put multiple CLDAP messages
in a single packet.  Simon has been suggesting wrapping them in an outer
SEQUENCE wrapper, or adding optional credentials to each operation.  Alan
and I have been suggesting requiring them all to be put in a single packet.

Simon and Alan, was there some resolution to this?           -- Tim