Re: DNS under o=Internet
yeongw@spartacus.psi.com Thu, 06 February 1992 01:47 UTC
Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10632; 5 Feb 92 20:47 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10625; 5 Feb 92 20:47 EST
Received: from spartacus.psi.com by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.23401-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Thu, 6 Feb 1992 00:16:38 +0000
Received: from localhost by spartacus.psi.com (5.61/1.3-PSI/PSINet) id AA01567; Wed, 5 Feb 92 19:17:21 -0500
Message-Id: <9202060017.AA01567@spartacus.psi.com>
To: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: DNS under o=Internet
Reply-To: yeongw@psi.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 05 Feb 92 15:12:54 +0000. <5643.697302774@cli53an>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 1992 19:17:19 -0500
From: yeongw@spartacus.psi.com
> Reading Christian's proposal leads me to think that now I > can go ask the IANA the give me a name. An "f.net" Domain name can > allocated from the IANA. Well, to be picky about it, I think you would go to the DCA (specifically it's agent the DDN NIC) since, while the IANA (or the successor-to-IANA) is the registration authority for the Internet as a whole, it has effectively delegated registration authority for the existing top-level DNS domains to the DDN NIC. > Do you think I could ask the IANA toallocate a Directory Name > for FNET No. The IANA doesn't have the authority to be the registry for Directory names. In my opinion, nobody does. Directory names are derived from external registries algorithmically, not assigned/allocated (except for those parts of the tree where the Directory is the registry, of course). > This may not cause such a problem for FNET, but let see > what could happen if another national network "sponsored" by the > french government tried to do so. > ... however continuing on the assumption that the IANA has the authority to be the Directory name registry for the Internet, I don't see why it would ever be a problem for another French national net to get a DNS domain also, say "f2.net" or something. Clearly I'm missing something here too. Wengyik
- DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: DNS under o=Internet William Manning
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Kenneth Carlberg
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Christian Huitema
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Tim Howes
- Re: DNS under o=Internet valdis
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Al Grimstad
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Mark Prior
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Sylvain Langlois
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Christian Huitema
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Christian Huitema
- Re: DNS under o=Internet William Manning
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Sylvain Langlois
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Sylvain Langlois
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Christian Huitema
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet A.Waugh
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Sylvain Langlois
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet A.Waugh
- Re: DNS under o=Internet George Michaelson
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet George Michaelson
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Steve Hardcastle-Kille