Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question
Erik Skovgaard <eskovgaa@cue.bc.ca> Thu, 03 June 1993 17:20 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06731; 3 Jun 93 13:20 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06727; 3 Jun 93 13:20 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15609; 3 Jun 93 13:20 EDT
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.03218-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Thu, 3 Jun 1993 17:02:51 +0100
Received: from cue.bc.ca by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.09804-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Thu, 3 Jun 1993 17:02:38 +0100
Received: by cue.bc.ca (5.65/Ultrix2.4-C) id AA05188; Wed, 2 Jun 93 09:00:35 -0700
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1993 09:00:35 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Erik Skovgaard <eskovgaa@cue.bc.ca>
Message-Id: <9306021600.AA05188@cue.bc.ca>
To: S.Kille@isode.com
Subject: Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question
Cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Steve, Again, it was not my intent to belittle the effort that went into PP and I also agree with you re. the "Mythical Man Month" statement. In fact, the first X.400 implementation that hit 100 man-years of developemnt is still one of the worst! All I was trying to relay was my perspective on X.400 products. Granted, that may be limited, but I have evaluated various vendor's products for the last fouur years. Please do not take my critique of PP (public) as a personal one. I know a lot of hard work went into the implementation and that it has many good features.. Cheers, %hello
- Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Tony Genovese
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Alf Hansen
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question James (J.K.) Ko
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Tony Genovese
- re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Huizer
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Goldstein--Ph +1-202-357-9717
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question James (J.K.) Ko
- re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Tony Genovese
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jon Crowcroft
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Colin Robbins
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Marco A. Hernandez
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Huizer
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Kille
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Alan.Young
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Julian Onions
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Goldstein--Ph +1-202-357-9717
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question pays
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Alf Hansen
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Sylvain Langlois
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Kille
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard