Re: Multiple O values in an entry...
Christian Huitema <Christian.Huitema@sophia.inria.fr> Wed, 17 February 1993 15:46 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06723; 17 Feb 93 10:46 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06719; 17 Feb 93 10:46 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13281; 17 Feb 93 10:45 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.02291-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 17 Feb 1993 14:38:24 +0000
Received: from mitsou.inria.fr by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.25760-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 17 Feb 1993 14:38:09 +0000
Received: by mitsou.inria.fr (5.65c/IDA-1.2.8) id AA05321; Wed, 17 Feb 1993 15:40:55 +0100
Message-Id: <199302171440.AA05321@mitsou.inria.fr>
To: Colin Robbins <c.robbins@nexor.nexor.mark400.gb>
Cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Multiple O values in an entry...
In-Reply-To: Your message of "17 Feb 93 14:28:04 GMT." <(q)4716 Wed Feb 17 14:27:20 1993(q)(a)nexor.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1993 15:40:54 +0100
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Christian Huitema <Christian.Huitema@sophia.inria.fr>
Should be be considering ways of controlling these high level attributes (please don't turn this into a debate about the merits of UFN - we've done that one several times!!!) I refrain myself of any such comment. But I can't help thinking. Christian Huitema
- Re: Multiple O values in an entry... Christian Huitema
- Multiple O values in an entry... Colin Robbins