Re: RFC1279 query
Steve Kille <S.Kille@isode.com> Fri, 20 August 1993 08:14 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00847;
20 Aug 93 4:14 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00843;
20 Aug 93 4:14 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02572;
20 Aug 93 4:14 EDT
Received: from glengoyne.isode.com by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP
id <g.02645-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Fri, 20 Aug 1993 09:08:06 +0100
To: Bob Smart <smart@mel.dit.csiro.au>
cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: RFC1279 query
Phone: +44-71-721-7582
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 20 Aug 1993 16:18:24 +1000.
<9308200618.AA07173@squid.mel.dit.CSIRO.AU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1993 09:08:11 +0100
Message-ID: <2420.745834091@isode.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Steve Kille <S.Kille@isode.com>
This was not realy done for MB comptatibility. Basically, the domain is defined by the postion in the DIT, and it would seem undesirable to repeat the information, and thus introduce the possibility of inconsistencies. Steve
- RFC1279 query Bob Smart
- Re: RFC1279 query Steve Kille
- Re: RFC1279 query Bob Smart
- Re: RFC1279 query Steve Kille