IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: DNS under o=Internet

Tim Howes <tim@terminator.cc.umich.edu> Tue, 04 February 1992 19:42 UTC

Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18017; 4 Feb 92 14:42 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18013; 4 Feb 92 14:42 EST
Received: from terminator.cc.umich.edu by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.04914-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Tue, 4 Feb 1992 18:33:11 +0000
Received: from vertigo.rs.itd.umich.edu by terminator.cc.umich.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA27430; Tue, 4 Feb 92 13:33:50 -0500
Message-Id: <9202041833.AA27430@terminator.cc.umich.edu>
To: Christian Huitema <Christian.Huitema@sophia.inria.fr>
Cc: Steve Hardcastle-Kille <S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.uk>, osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: DNS under o=Internet
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 04 Feb 92 17:16:02 GMT." <199202041616.AA24525@mitsou.inria.fr>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1992 13:33:48 -0500
From: Tim Howes <tim@terminator.cc.umich.edu>

> I support Wengyik on this. Registering the Internet Domain Name server under
> "O=Internet" is much cleaner than messing with the root. It carves a neat
> name space for Internet domains, and avoids conflicts with national
> authorities. 

I support both Wengyik and Christian on this.  Registering the DNS at
the root may be elegant, but it will lead to problems when we try to
integrate this pilot with others.  By putting it under o=Internet, we
will avoid these problems.                                  -- Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email