Rep : Re: Rep : overloading cn= in the DIT
Alain Zahm <zahm@osi.e3x.fr> Fri, 31 July 1992 09:59 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01392; 31 Jul 92 5:59 EDT
Received: from NRI.NRI.Reston.Va.US by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01388; 31 Jul 92 5:59 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04575; 31 Jul 92 6:00 EDT
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.03679-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Fri, 31 Jul 1992 10:52:47 +0100
Via: uk.ac.mhs-relay; Fri, 31 Jul 1992 10:52:40 +0100
X400-Received: by mta mhs-relay.ac.uk in /PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD= /C=gb/; Relayed; Fri, 31 Jul 1992 10:52:12 +0100
X400-Received: by /PRMD=inria/ADMD=atlas/C=FR/; Relayed; Fri, 17 Jul 1992 14:40:52 +0100
X400-Received: by /PRMD=e3x/ADMD=atlas/C=FR/; Relayed; Fri, 17 Jul 1992 14:55:46 +0100
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1992 14:55:46 +0100
X400-Originator: zahm@osi.e3x.fr
X400-Recipients: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
X400-MTS-Identifier: [/PRMD=e3x/ADMD=atlas/C=FR/;7113813464618zahm]
X400-Content-Type: P2-1984 (2)
Content-Identifier: u-ua
From: Alain Zahm <zahm@osi.e3x.fr>
Message-ID: <7113813464618zahm*/S=zahm/OU=osi/O=e3x/PRMD=e3x/ADMD=atlas/C=FR/@MHS>
To: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk, osi-ds@cicb.fr
Cc: George Michaelson <G.Michaelson@cc.uq.oz.au>
In-Reply-To: <19584.711372275@brolga.cc.uq.oz.au>
References: <7113748553403zahm*/S=zahm/OU=osi/O=e3x/PRMD=e3x/ADMD=atlas/C=FR/@MHS>
Subject: Rep : Re: Rep : overloading cn= in the DIT
Sender: zahm@osi.e3x.fr
> Still dont like the model. requiring me to use specified syntax in a > (esentially) freeform type is wrong. If thats the solution then its > as bad as the problem. > By imposing the use of a specified RDN in a DN you are doing exactly the same : requiring to use a specified syntax in an open structure > The answer is: shoot all DUA designers who dont hide this from the user. But we are not speaking about User interfaces, its a naming problem. > > If MTA/DUA/NSAP/other was not co-erced into cn= instances, that wouldnt > be neccessary. regretably... > > On a more serious note, to what extent IS this foisted on us by the > standards? do we have room to re-consider before the DIT grows too > big to change? > > -George > > Alain Zahm
- Re: Rep : overloading cn= in the DIT George Michaelson
- Rep : overloading cn= in the DIT Alain Zahm
- Rep : Re: Rep : overloading cn= in the DIT Alain Zahm
- Re: Rep : Re: Rep : overloading cn= in the DIT Valdis Kletnieks