Re: Chaining vs Referrals ?? -Reply

Colin Robbins <c.robbins@nexor.co.uk> Mon, 26 February 1996 17:30 UTC

Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23258; 26 Feb 96 12:30 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23254; 26 Feb 96 12:30 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10654; 26 Feb 96 12:30 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.04619-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Mon, 26 Feb 1996 10:28:29 +0000
Received: from lancaster.nexor.co.uk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with UK SMTP id <g.07604-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Mon, 26 Feb 1996 10:28:09 +0000
Received: from victor.nexor.co.uk by lancaster.nexor.co.uk with SMTP (MMTA) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Feb 1996 10:23:54 +0000
To: Ed Reed <Ed_Reed@novell.com>
cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk, LIVINGSTON-C@smtpgw.nctsw.navy.mil
Subject: Re: Chaining vs Referrals ?? -Reply
In-reply-to: Your message of Sat, 24 Feb 1996 12:20:14 -0800. <s12f080a.007@fromGW>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 10:23:35 GMT
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Colin Robbins <c.robbins@nexor.co.uk>
Message-ID: <9602261230.aa10654@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>

   >From a performance standpoint, the chaining model can, but may not,
   >afford superior cache support at the DSA, particularly if many DUAs
   >regularly access the same portions of the tree and can share cached
   >results of their queries. 

Alas, with the X.500(93) access control model, caching within a DSA is
very hard to do, as the access control information is not carried with
the data over DSP.  Consequently, the role of a DSA cache is severly
limited, if allowed at all.


Colin