Re: Directory Services Activities Report - 10/92

Steve Hardcastle-Kille <S.Kille@isode.com> Mon, 12 October 1992 14:47 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09600; 12 Oct 92 10:47 EDT
Received: from NRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09596; 12 Oct 92 10:47 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17044; 12 Oct 92 10:48 EDT
Received: from glengoyne.isode.com by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.00716-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Mon, 12 Oct 1992 14:59:52 +0100
Received: from localhost by glengoyne.isode.com with SMTP (PP) id <02002-0@glengoyne.isode.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 1992 10:46:13 +0100
To: "K. Spanier" <spanier@mailserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de>
cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Directory Services Activities Report - 10/92
Phone: +44-71-223-4062
In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 12 Oct 92 09:27:38 +0100. <9210120827.AA06770@melvin.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 92 10:46:11 +0100
Message-ID: <2000.718883171@isode.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Steve Hardcastle-Kille <S.Kille@isode.com>

I think that 500 operations per day is quite respectable.   This is clearly
real use for white pages type services.   The levels seem to jump 
dramatically either due to mail system integration or due to provision
of an easily accessible front end (e.g., Gopher)

Steve