Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question
Jock Gill <jgill@nsf.gov> Mon, 31 May 1993 18:06 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26609; 31 May 93 14:06 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26605; 31 May 93 14:06 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26968; 31 May 93 14:06 EDT
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.05801-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Mon, 31 May 1993 18:11:13 +0100
Received: from note.nsf.gov by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.03901-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Mon, 31 May 1993 18:11:08 +0100
Received: from hub.nsf.gov by Note.nsf.gov id aa25391; 31 May 93 13:10 EDT
Received: by hub.nsf.gov (5.57/Ultrix3.0-C) id AA25236; Mon, 31 May 93 13:08:56 -0400
Date: Mon, 31 May 1993 13:12:16 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Jock Gill <jgill@nsf.gov>
Subject: Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question
To: Steve Goldstein--Ph +1-202-357-9717 <sgoldste@cise.cise.nsf.gov>
Cc: Erik Huizer <Erik.Huizer@surfnet.nl>, "James (J.K.) Ko" <jamesko@bnr.ca>, genovese@ophelia.nersc.gov, osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
In-Reply-To: <9305271244.AA04796@cise.cise.nsf.gov>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.05a.9305311314.F14868-a100000@note1.nsf.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Steve, I would generally agree with you. The issue is empowerment and not control. Government is to serve the people and not to constrain them. Government is for the people and not the institutions -- at least the last time I looked. Regards, JPG ______________________________________________________________________________ Jonathan P. Gill Office of Media Affairs The White House (202) 456-7150 ______________________________________________________________________________
- Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Tony Genovese
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Alf Hansen
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question James (J.K.) Ko
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Tony Genovese
- re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Huizer
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Goldstein--Ph +1-202-357-9717
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question James (J.K.) Ko
- re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Tony Genovese
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jon Crowcroft
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Colin Robbins
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Marco A. Hernandez
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Huizer
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Kille
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Alan.Young
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Julian Onions
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Goldstein--Ph +1-202-357-9717
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question pays
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Alf Hansen
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Sylvain Langlois
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Kille
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard