Re: Surnames and indexing white pages
David Herron <david@twg.com> Tue, 17 August 1993 18:10 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11289;
17 Aug 93 14:10 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11285;
17 Aug 93 14:10 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16656;
17 Aug 93 14:10 EDT
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP
id <g.05137-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Tue, 17 Aug 1993 18:21:37 +0100
Received: from eco.twg.com by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP
id <g.18552-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Tue, 17 Aug 1993 18:21:13 +0100
Received: from LOCAL.eco.twg.com by eco.twg.com (5.67/ECO.m-$Revision: 2.16 $)
id AA05131; Tue, 17 Aug 93 13:20:23 -0400
Message-Id: <9308171720.AA05131@eco.twg.com>
Received: from apache.twg.com by apache.twg.com id <29985-0@apache.twg.com>;
Tue, 17 Aug 1993 10:20:50 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: David Herron <david@twg.com>
Subject: Re: Surnames and indexing white pages
To: IPM Return Requested <osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 10:20:48 PDT
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 17 Aug 1993 11:57:05 +0100
(BST).<23484.9308171057@molnir.brunel.ac.uk>
Sensitivity: Personal
Conversion: Prohibited
Conversion-With-Loss: Prohibited
Encoding: 7 TEXT
> It would also break a lot of existing implementations. Far better to > go along with the standard that exists but to use a null value or > follow som other convention (like the `single space' convention for > ADMDs in X.400). Hmm.. sounds like a failure mode of the process. If the OSI/ISO process cannot fold in
- Surnames and indexing white pages john
- Re: Surnames and indexing white pages George Michaelson
- Re: Surnames and indexing white pages Andrew Findlay
- Re: Surnames and indexing white pages Tim Howes
- Re: Surnames and indexing white pages David Herron
- Re: Surnames and indexing white pages David Herron