Re: DNS under o=Internet
yeongw@spartacus.psi.com Wed, 05 February 1992 02:35 UTC
Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02265; 4 Feb 92 21:35 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02261; 4 Feb 92 21:35 EST
Received: from spartacus.psi.com by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.19982-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 5 Feb 1992 01:29:54 +0000
Received: from localhost by spartacus.psi.com (5.61/1.3-PSI/PSINet) id AA00201; Tue, 4 Feb 92 20:30:38 -0500
Message-Id: <9202050130.AA00201@spartacus.psi.com>
To: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: DNS under o=Internet
Reply-To: yeongw@psi.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 04 Feb 92 13:53:20 -0500. <9202041922.AA08157@psi.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1992 20:30:37 -0500
From: yeongw@spartacus.psi.com
> Wngyik says: "My solution is to avoid the problem altogether by viewing > the DIT as a listing hierarchy :-)." The problem is that *somebody* > has to take responsibility for *registration* The problem of coordination with registration authorities is a general one. The moment you view any part of the DIT as a reflection of some external structure, you have to coordinate with the people who have responsibility for that external structure. The point you raised is equally valid with respect to the current civil structure in the U.S. Because that is supposedly aligned with the U.S. civil infrastructure, I *should* be checking with the civil authorities when someone asks for a particular listing. I don't, actually, since, as I said in my message (to the U.S. pilot participants, not this list), I'm going to run this on the honor system until such a time that I am no longer able to. In my opinion, we should just leave registration in the hands of the current authorities (the DDN NIC). Then operationally we can either take requests to list under the toplevel domains on the honor system, or check with the DDN NIC (which is easy enough to do). All this assuming that we do eventually end up with a listing DIT, not a registration DIT. Wengyik
- DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: DNS under o=Internet William Manning
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Kenneth Carlberg
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Christian Huitema
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Tim Howes
- Re: DNS under o=Internet valdis
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Al Grimstad
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Mark Prior
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Sylvain Langlois
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Christian Huitema
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Christian Huitema
- Re: DNS under o=Internet William Manning
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Sylvain Langlois
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Sylvain Langlois
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Christian Huitema
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet A.Waugh
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Sylvain Langlois
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet A.Waugh
- Re: DNS under o=Internet George Michaelson
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet George Michaelson
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Steve Hardcastle-Kille