Re: getting oids

Peter Furniss <cziwprf@pluto.ulcc.ac.uk> Wed, 09 November 1994 17:11 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05144; 9 Nov 94 12:11 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05140; 9 Nov 94 12:11 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10108; 9 Nov 94 12:11 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.00913-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 9 Nov 1994 15:27:25 +0000
Received: from pluto.ulcc.ac.uk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.19898-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 9 Nov 1994 15:27:16 +0000
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Peter Furniss <cziwprf@pluto.ulcc.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <24914.9411091526@pluto.ulcc.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: getting oids
To: Tomasz Wolniewicz <twoln@mat.uni.torun.pl>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 1994 15:26:32 +0000
Cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
In-Reply-To: <no.id> from "Tomasz Wolniewicz" at Nov 9, 94 09:43:46 am
Reply-To: P.Furniss@ulcc.ac.uk
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 2213

> 
> >      The "official" way in which anyone in the world is supposed to get an
> >      oid prefix is via their national standards body (supra-national
> >      organisations are an open question). It cannot be expected that all
> 
> How could you advise a poor soul like me who has gone calling 10 different
> organizations in Poland being sent from one to another and finally closing
> the circle?. Is there a body in Europe that could tell me if the is a
> national organization responsible for OIDs in Poland and if not could
> provide me with a prefix? We are currently using some nomber that I have
> invented but that is not terribly healthy of course.

My phrase "it cannot be expected" was because of such. According to
the Standards_FAQ (on comp.std.misc, amongst others), the Polish ISO
member is

Poland/Pologne (PKNMIJ)
*Polish Committee for
Standardization,
Measures and Quality Control
UI. Elektoralna 2
00-139 WARSZAWA
TP +48 22 20 54 34
TF +48 22 20 83 78
TX 81 36 42 pkn pl
TG pekanim

Which means the oid {iso(1) memberbody(2) poland(616) }
is assigned to PKNMIJ, for them to use as prefix of further assignements.

However, Poland does not appear to be a member of JTC1 (the ISO/IEC
committee that covers IT standards), so they may not be aware of the
expectations of ISO/IEC 9834-1, which is the registration standard.
(The same standard is also concerned with the top of the Directory
naming tree too).

ISO in Geneva would know the current position, but I don't think they
expect to provide a "registry of last resort" for countries whose
standards bodies are not active in this area.

Which is why extending the IANA registration would have advantages.

Peter
ps: I will pass the question to the editor of 9834-1, to see if he has
any suggestions 

pps: iso's address is (also taken from standards_faq)


International Organization for Standardization
Case postale 56
1, rue de Varembi
CH-1211 Genhve 20
Switzerland

            national        (022) 749 01 11    (In correct and complete
Telephone   -------------------------------     CCITT E.123 notation :-)
            international  +41 22 749 01 11

Telefax     +41 22 733 34 30
Telex       41 22 05 iso ch
Telegrams   isorganiz