Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question
Erik Skovgaard <eskovgaa@cue.bc.ca> Tue, 01 June 1993 17:16 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08948; 1 Jun 93 13:16 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08944; 1 Jun 93 13:15 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16649; 1 Jun 93 13:15 EDT
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.09208-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Tue, 1 Jun 1993 16:40:20 +0100
Received: from cue.bc.ca by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.26296-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Tue, 1 Jun 1993 16:40:09 +0100
Received: by cue.bc.ca (5.65/Ultrix2.4-C) id AA21009; Mon, 31 May 93 08:34:38 -0700
Date: Mon, 31 May 1993 08:34:38 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Erik Skovgaard <eskovgaa@cue.bc.ca>
Message-Id: <9305311534.AA21009@cue.bc.ca>
To: jgill@nsf.gov
Subject: Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question
Cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
But you are wrong. Almost all computer vendors have X.400 software. However, many of them have chosen to implement X.400 as a gateway and preserve their existing user interfaces. Without conducting an actual survey I would guess there are more commercial implementations of X.400 than SMTP - unless you count Unix where it is given away for free. My estimate of investment in X.400 products is somewhere in the $2-300M range, but I may only know part of the story. Now, if you ask what sells, my answer is going to be different. You will find that the proprietary mail systems such as cc:Mail and Microsoft Mail sell the most copies right now. Cheers, ....Erik.
- Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Tony Genovese
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Alf Hansen
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question James (J.K.) Ko
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Tony Genovese
- re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Huizer
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Goldstein--Ph +1-202-357-9717
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question James (J.K.) Ko
- re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Tony Genovese
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jon Crowcroft
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Colin Robbins
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Marco A. Hernandez
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Huizer
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Kille
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Alan.Young
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Julian Onions
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Goldstein--Ph +1-202-357-9717
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Jock Gill
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question pays
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Alf Hansen
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Sylvain Langlois
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Eric D. Williams
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Steve Kille
- Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question Erik Skovgaard